King James Onlyism: A New Sect
This is an extensive study of the new doctrine known as King James Onlyism. It deals with the origin and erroneous claims of the doctrine.
Open documentHis Books, Papers, etc.
This page contains articles written by James D. Price in response to various advocates of King James Onlyism, and reviews of books supporting that view.
This is an extensive study of the new doctrine known as King James Onlyism. It deals with the origin and erroneous claims of the doctrine.
Open documentThis file is Price's Response to Don Waite's critique to his book, King James Onlyism: A New Sect.
Open documentThis file contains the corrected index of persons and topics for the book King James Onlyism: A New Sect
Open documentThis file contains corrections for the book King James Onlyism: A New Sect
Open documentThis file is a review of Theology for Every Christian: A Systematic Theology in the Reformed and Premillennial Tradition of J. Oliver Buswell, by Timothy Tow and Jeffrey Khoo.
Open documentThis file is an abstract of Price's book, King James Onlyism: A New Sect
Open documentThis file is a brochure of Price's book, King James Onlyism: a New Sect. It provides a brief abstract, table of contents and ordering information.
Open documentThis File contains a review of King James Onlyism: A New Sect by Doug Kutilek.
Open documentThis file is a review of King James Onlyism: A New Sect by Pastor Gary Small in The Biblical Evangelist.
Open documentThis file is a review of King James Onlyism: A New Sect written by Prof. Greg Stephens, Academic Dean, Temple Baptist Seminary.
Open documentThis file is a review of Price's book written by Dr. Barkev S. Trachian, Ph.D., Director of the Graduate School, Piedmont Baptist College and Graduate School.
Open documentThis file is Price's response to Jeffrey Khoo's critical review of the Book, King James Onlyism: A New Sect. It shows how Khoo has no existing textual standard without an appeal to the KJV.
Open documentThis file is Price's response to Jeffrey Khoo's article, “A Plea for a Perfect Bible,” defending the KJV-Only view written in 2002.
Open documentThis file is Price's reply to Khoo's response to his review of “An Appeal for a Perfect Bible.”
Open documentThis file is Price's review of David Norton's book, A Textual History of the King James Bible, published Cambridge Univ. Press in 2005.
Open documentThis file contains a description of the eclectic nature of the Greek Text used by the translators of the Authorized Version.
Open documentThis file contains the truth about the Magdalen Papyrus, an early Greek manuscript that some KJV Only advocates regard as a first century witness to the Textus Receptus.
Open documentThis file contains lists of various types of changes that have taken place in the King James Version, including spelling, grammar, punctuation, and deviations from the Masoretic Text.
Open documentThis file is a review of Theodore P. Letis' book, The Ecclesiastical Text, written in 1997. It is a defense of the Textus Receptus based on it being the text of the Reformation rather than the text behind the KJV.
Open documentThis file is a review of Lloyd L. Streeter's book, Seventy-five Problems with Central Baptist's Seminary's Book: The Bible Version Debate, published in 2001. The book is a defense of the King James Only view presented in the form of a critical review of a book defending the historical Baptist doctrine of Scripture.
Open documentThis file is a review of Charles Surrett's book, Which Greek Text? The Debate Among Fundamentalists, published in 1999. He supports the Textus Receptus and claims to reject the concept of inspired translation.
Open document